Tag Archives: olympics

In the News: February Blur

This super short month has gone by in a blur. While several substantive ideas have come out of this period, they need more time to marinate. Here are some tidbits from the last few weeks:

*The announcement that London would be hosting the 2012 summer Olympics spurred hope in Britain that there would be a marked increase in the number of normal citizens taking on regular exercise.  A NYTimes article last week reports that this has sadly not been the case, with new parks and other facilities going unused. (I’m sure I wrote about all of this in relation to obesity back when it was announced!)

*A very interesting article in Inside Higher Ed discusses the growth and impact of anthropologists without doctorates.

*OHR has a newly revamped website – check it out!

*The National HIV/AIDS Prevention Strategy (which came out last year) has gotten the full backing of the White House. In a blog post up yesterday, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health, Infectious Diseases, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Ron Valdiserri makes the science-backed case for this strategy.

*Finally, yesterday I attended a roundtable workshop at IOM. The goal of the day was to examine how disparities and inequity impact overall life expectancy of certain populations within the United States and what policy shifts are needed to change these trends. It was a dynamic discussion and a reminder that all of us need to be thinking about ALL populations in our work towards better health.

Pass it On

Last night, I witnessed the infectious way good news can spread within a network of friends – improving everyone’s well-being. The theory that social networks and connections affect individuals and populations is not necessarily new, but has begun to make it big in discussions of health. It is being used to examine many aspects of health from eating habits to infectious disease. As social beings, humans are easily influenced and transformed by those around them. Our networks literally allow ideas, actions, habits, and beliefs to spread, in the same way a pathogen moves from one organism to another. Two areas where this “networking” theory could provide amazing breakthroughs are obesity and AIDS.

In their book Connected, Nicholas Christakis and James Fowler explore how social networks shape our lives. One of their arguments is that these social connections can literally shape our lives by affecting what we eat, when we eat, how we eat, how we exercise, and our views on body size and image. These types of influences can have both positive and negative impacts on our bodies. Christakis gave a TED Talk earlier this month on the spread of obesity through networks, and Fowler has made an appearance on the Colbert Report explaining how even our connections through social networking sites affect our health. Most simply, if those you are connected to are obese, you are more likely to be obese. If those around you exercise regularly, you are more likely to exercise. And if your friends have body image ideals that are unhealthy, you are more apt to as well. We all know obesity is a hot topic in the United States, Mrs. Obama’s determined goal to put an end to childhood obesity has been in the news as of late. Changing the way we eat and approach food will have to come as a cultural shift, and shifts of this magnitude come from infecting a network with a new “habitus” of food.

The infectious character of HIV/AIDS does not come only in the form of bodily fluids passed from one individual to another, but in the social environments in which it spreads. Yes, effective prevention programs and stronger health infrastructures on the continent of Africa and in countries like Haiti will help to stop the disease. The environments in which AIDS spreads, however, are complex social networks with deep cultural and ecologic roots. In a post earlier this week, I discussed the strong stigmas in many African societies surrounding AIDS, stigmas which in many cases are perpetuating its spread. By effectively shifting the thought process of several individuals – in a way that blends with the local fabric of life and understanding – whole social networks can begin to change their beliefs and behaviors, as well as the structural barriers which force individuals to choose certain actions over others. Organizations such as the Organic Health Response (in Kenya) and The Global Micro-Clinic Project (in several developing countries) are working to improve health outcomes through social solidarity – stopping the spread of infection at the social level.

The strength of social networks is evident even at the Olympics. As these games come to an end, we have witnessed the communal admiration, triumph, and pride one person and one event can create. This theory, the impact social networks have on our health, can and should be applied to everything from maternal mortality (birthing practices, nutrition, and cultural capital) to health care reform (how we pay for it and who gets coverage). Good news can spread among friends in the blink of an eye and the strength of our very human, and very powerful, social networks can affect our individual and collective well-being without us even noticing…an idea we should spread!

*Image is author’s own.

In the News: Cabin Fever

*There have been various academic debates about the benefits and downsides to prehistoric lifestyles and diets. Apparently, however, some people aren’t waiting to see the next journal article and are trying it out themselves. The “philosophy is based on the idea that the human body is best suited to the lifestyle of the people who roamed the Earth tens of thousands of years ago” – this includes running across the Brooklyn Bridge barefoot!

*Following-up on a post I had a couple of weeks ago on Haiti’s health concerns going forward – an article from last week’s NYTimes on Haiti’s fight against TB and a report from Dr. Tom Kirsch on advanced TB and HIV/AIDS in Haiti from Haiti: Operational Biosurveillance.

*Interesting report on ABC WorldNews on changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. What is normal and what is a ‘disorder’? Do we, as a culture, over diagnosis? I tend to lean towards ‘yes’, but can a label sometimes serve a positive purpose and allow individuals to self-advocate? What makes this all more complicated is how the changes in diagnosis procedures will affect prescriptions, insurance, drug companies, education, etc. Complicated and messy.

*Don’t forget, the Vancouver Olympics start tomorrow (Feb. 12)! They may not be that related to health, but I definitely think the Olympics, at the very least, will do a little good for everyone’s well-being!